{"id":155426,"date":"2023-03-14T19:40:25","date_gmt":"2023-03-14T19:40:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shrm.org\/resourcesandtools\/legal-and-compliance\/state-and-local-updates\/pages\/michigan-right-to-work.aspx"},"modified":"2023-03-14T19:40:25","modified_gmt":"2023-03-14T19:40:25","slug":"michigan-house-passes-bills-to-repeal-states-right-to-work-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/squarehr.com\/index.php\/2023\/03\/14\/michigan-house-passes-bills-to-repeal-states-right-to-work-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Michigan House Passes Bills to Repeal State\u2019s Right-to-Work Law"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

?On March 8, the Michigan House of Representatives passed two bills that would repeal Michigan’s current right-to-work law. The two bills, House Bill 4004<\/a> and HB 4005<\/a>, passed 56\u201353 along party lines.<\/p>\n

HB 4004 relates specifically to right to work in the public sector, while HB 4005 relates to right to work in the private sector.<\/p>\n

Both bills would remove the prohibition under Michigan’s current right-to-work law that makes it illegal to require an employee to pay dues or agency fees to a union as a condition of obtaining or continuing employment. <\/p>\n

This means that union security clauses in collective bargaining agreements would become legal again for the first time in Michigan since the state enacted its right-to-work law in 2012. Those clauses allow a union to compel an employer to discharge an employee for refusing to pay dues or agency fees, which are required to be paid by employees who object to paying for union activities unrelated to collective bargaining and grievance administration, such as organizing the employees of other employers, lobbying for political legislation, and participating in social, charitable, and political events.<\/p>\n

The public-sector bill is, at this point, just a symbolic move, as the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31<\/em><\/a> makes it impermissible for unions or government employers to compel government employees to pay union dues.<\/p>\n

The two bills now move to the Michigan Senate for further debate. As the Senate will not be in session from March 24 to April 10 due to spring break, it is expected that debate on the bills will be completed before the break begins. If passed in the Senate, the bills would proceed to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for her likely signature.<\/p>\n

Christopher R. Mikula is an attorney with Ogletree Deakins in Detroit. <\/em>\u00a9<\/em> 2023. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission. <\/em><\/p>\n