Associated General Contractors of America v. State of Washington,<\/em> upholding this new model where state contractors must follow a prevailing wage requirement based on the highest collectively bargained wage rate for the relevant trade in the county where they operate. What do Washington State employers need to know about this development?<\/p>\nNew Structure Challenged <\/p>\n
Prior to these amendments, the industrial statistician set prevailing wages in each county for each trade based on the majority or average wage rate in that county. Citing an effort to increase the statistician’s efficiency, the legislature’s amendments now require the statistician to adopt the highest wage set by a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) in the relevant county.<\/p>\n
Certain contractor associations challenged the new amendments, and the Washington Court of Appeals sided with these associations. The appellate court struck down the amendments as an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. It ruled that the legislature had not provided the statistician clear standards in exercising their authority, thereby mandating the statistician to rely on CBA wage rates that did not yet exist.<\/p>\n
In the most recent ruling, however, the state Supreme Court disagreed. It flipped the Court of Appeals’ decision and held that the legislature provided the requisite standard by requiring the statistician to adopt the highest wage set by CBA in a county.<\/p>\n
What Now?<\/p>\n
As a result of the state Supreme Court’s decision, public works contractors must now pay the wage rate set by the more generous CBA in each county where they perform work. This rate may no longer reflect the actual wage rate prevailing through a county, but rather a rate that applies to a minority of workers who have successfully bargained with other employers for a more generous wage through threats of labor action or by relying on powerful union backing.<\/p>\n
Likewise, if a CBA mostly covers workers in a higher wage market, like Seattle, and mandates wage rates reflective of that market, but also covers some smaller number of workers in a county with lower average wages, the higher rate in the CBA may become the prevailing wage in both localities. Indeed, the Court of Appeals cited one such CBA already in effect in its decision.<\/p>\n
As the Washington Supreme Court reached its decision based on state law, and because numerous federal courts have upheld similar prevailing wage standards under federal labor law, it is unlikely that the contractor associations will be able to obtain review before the U.S. Supreme Court. As such, public works contractors will have to consider the wage rates set by CBAs in each county where they perform or bid for state projects.<\/p>\n
The Washington Supreme Court left open, however, the question of whether public works contractors can challenge whether those CBAs are valid under governing law. Stay tuned for possible refinements from state courts on this point. <\/p>\n
Jeremy F. Wood is an attorney with Fisher Phillips in Seattle. <\/em>\u00a9<\/em> 2022. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.<\/em><\/p>\n
![](\"http:\/\/squarehr.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/court-upholds-prevailing-wage-statute-in-washington-state.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![](\"http:\/\/squarehr.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/court-upholds-prevailing-wage-statute-in-washington-state-1.jpg\")
<\/div>\n