{"id":2714,"date":"2011-01-13T14:48:42","date_gmt":"2011-01-13T14:48:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hrresource.com\/articles\/view.php?article_id=4151"},"modified":"2011-01-13T14:48:42","modified_gmt":"2011-01-13T14:48:42","slug":"supreme-court-medical-resident-stipend-ruling-highlights-advisability-of-worker-classification-payroll-practice-review-advisable-for-health-care-other-employers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/squarehr.com\/index.php\/2011\/01\/13\/supreme-court-medical-resident-stipend-ruling-highlights-advisability-of-worker-classification-payroll-practice-review-advisable-for-health-care-other-employers\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Medical Resident Stipend Ruling Highlights Advisability of Worker Classification & Payroll Practice Review Advisable For Health Care, Other Employers"},"content":{"rendered":"

Stipends paid to medical residents to provide on patient care and other medical services for 40 or more hours per week as part of a accredited graduate medical education program are wages paid to employees for Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) payroll taxes purposes and do not qualify as exempt from FICA tax or withholding as student stipends according to January 11, 201 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Mayo Foundation v. U.S.   The decision is the latest reminder to health care providers and others of the need to critically review and update as necessary their organizations existing worker and wage characterization in light of evolving interpretations and the growing success of regulators and private plaintiffs in challenging these classifications.
\n