Editor’s Note: This is breaking news, and the article will be updated throughout the day.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) will issue a final rule on Aug. 8 to raise the prevailing wage standard for approximately 1 million construction workers under the federal Davis-Bacon Act.
The number of construction workers affected by the new prevailing wages is likely to increase in light of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law of 2021, which funded many federal infrastructure projects, senior Biden administration officials said.
The final rule will provide periodic updates for noncollectively bargained wages. It also adds anti-retaliation provisions and strengthens the DOL’s ability to withhold money from a federal contractor in order to pay employees their lost wages.
The final rule gives the DOL authority to adopt prevailing wages determined by state and local governments, issue wage determinations for labor classifications where insufficient data was received through the wage survey process, and update outdated wage rates.
The Davis-Bacon regulations haven’t been comprehensively updated in 40 years.
Background
The Supreme Court has described the Davis-Bacon Act as “a minimum wage law designed for the benefit of construction workers,” the DOL noted in its summary of the proposed rule. The law, enacted in 1931, requires the payment of locally prevailing wages and fringe benefits on federal contracts for construction. It applies to workers on contracts in excess of $2,000 entered into by federal agencies and the District of Columbia for the construction, alteration or repair of public buildings or public works.
The law’s purpose is to protect local wage standards by preventing contractors from basing their bids on wages lower than those prevailing in the area, the Supreme Court has noted.
In the new rule, the DOL recommended returning to a three-step process previously used to identify the most frequently used wage rate for each classification of workers in a locality.
This three-step process identified as prevailing:
- Any wage rate paid to a majority of workers.
- If there was no wage rate paid to a majority of workers, then the wage rate paid to the greatest number of workers, provided it was paid to at least 30 percent of workers—the so-called 30-percent rule.
- If the 30-percent rule wasn’t met, the weighted average rate.
The three-step process relegated the average rate to a final, fallback method of determining the prevailing rate. The average wage can pull down the prevailing wage if some employers pay workers significantly less.
A rule that took effect in 1983 eliminated the second step in this process. At the time, the DOL said that the 30-percent rule may be inflationary and give undue weight to collectively bargained wages.
But now the DOL has concluded that this change was mistaken or resulted in outcomes that didn’t align with the Davis-Bacon Act.
Recent research shows that wage increases, particularly at the low end of the distribution, do not cause significant economywide price increases, the DOL has said.
The DOL said the use of weighted averages has increased from 15 percent of classification rates across all wage determinations before 1982 to 64 percent of classification determinations now. This overuse is inconsistent with the text and purpose of the law, the DOL noted.
The final rule comes as inflation has fallen by two-thirds over the last year, and inflation-adjusted wages are up 2.4 percent for nonsupervisory construction workers, according to a press release from Vice President Kamala Harris.
Republican Opposition
U.S. Rep. Virginia Foxx, chair of the U.S. House Education and the Workforce Committee, called the rule change reckless and irresponsible. “Reverting
back to a decades-old definition of prevailing wage and undermining reforms
that were made to a broken system makes no sense to taxpayers and is clearly
intended to be a handout to union bosses at the expense of smaller construction
companies and their workers,” she said. The rule change will “drastically increase the costs of federal construction projects,
leading to fewer completed infrastructure projects and a greater burden on
taxpayers.”
U.S. Sen. Bill Cassidy said, “This new rule would
defy 40 years of precedent and disregard the nonpartisan Goverment Accountability Office’s warning that
this action would drastically inflate the price of construction.”
